Test Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps.zip, Pdf Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Version

The cost of registering a Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification is quite expensive, ranging between $100 and $1000. After paying such an amount, the candidate is sure to be on a tight budget. PassCollection provides Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate preparation material at very low prices compared to other platforms. We also assure you that the amount will not be wasted and you will not have to pay for the certification a second time. For added reassurance, we also provide up to 1 year of free updates. Free demo version of the actual product is also available so that you can verify its validity before purchasing. The key to passing the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam on the first try is vigorous practice. And that's exactly what you'll get when you prepare from our material. Each format excels in its own way and helps you get success on the first attempt.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal licensing requirements in this topic.
Topic 2	Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.
Topic 3	Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.
Topic 4	Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.

>> Test Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps.zip <<

Hot Test Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps.zip | Latest Pdf Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Version: Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps is a surefire way to get success. PassCollection has assisted a lot of professionals in passing their Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification test. In case you don't pass the Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate pdf questions and practice tests, you have the full right to claim your full refund. You can download and test any Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions format before purchase. So don't get worried, start Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam preparation and get successful.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q51-Q56):

NEW QUESTION # 51
A Generative AI Engineer is building an LLM to generate article summaries in the form of a type of poem, such as a haiku, given the article content. However, the initial output from the LLM does not match the desired tone or style.
Which approach will NOT improve the LLM's response to achieve the desired response?

A. Use a neutralizer to normalize the tone and style of the underlying documents
B. Fine-tune the LLM on a dataset of desired tone and style
C. Include few-shot examples in the prompt to the LLM
D. Provide the LLM with a prompt that explicitly instructs it to generate text in the desired tone and style

Answer: A

Explanation:
The task at hand is to improve the LLM's ability to generate poem-like article summaries with the desired tone and style. Using aneutralizerto normalize the tone and style of the underlying documents (option B) will not help improve the LLM's ability to generate the desired poetic style. Here's why:
* Neutralizing Underlying Documents:A neutralizer aims to reduce or standardize the tone of input data. However, this contradicts the goal, which is to generate text with aspecific tone and style(like haikus). Neutralizing the source documents will strip away the richness of the content, making it harder for the LLM to generate creative, stylistic outputs like poems.
* Why Other Options Improve Results:
* A (Explicit Instructions in the Prompt): Directly instructing the LLM to generate text in a specific tone and style helps align the output with the desired format (e.g., haikus). This is a common and effective technique in prompt engineering.
* C (Few-shot Examples): Providing examples of the desired output format helps the LLM understand the expected tone and structure, making it easier to generate similar outputs.
* D (Fine-tuning the LLM): Fine-tuning the model on a dataset that contains examples of the desired tone and style is a powerful way to improve the model's ability to generate outputs that match the target format.
Therefore, using a neutralizer (option B) isnotan effective method for achieving the goal of generating stylized poetic summaries.

NEW QUESTION # 52
A Generative Al Engineer has successfully ingested unstructured documents and chunked them by document sections. They would like to store the chunks in a Vector Search index. The current format of the dataframe has two columns: (i) original document file name (ii) an array of text chunks for each document.
What is the most performant way to store this dataframe?

A. Flatten the dataframe to one chunk per row, create a unique identifier for each row, and save to a Delta table
B. Store each chunk as an independent JSON file in Unity Catalog Volume. For each JSON file, the key is the document section name and the value is the array of text chunks for that section
C. Split the data into train and test set, create a unique identifier for each document, then save to a Delta table
D. First create a unique identifier for each document, then save to a Delta table

Answer: A

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs an efficient way to store chunks of unstructured documents to facilitate easy retrieval and search. The current dataframe consists of document filenames and associated text chunks.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Splitting into train and test sets is more relevant for model training scenarios and not directly applicable to storage for retrieval in a Vector Search index.
* Option B: Flattening the dataframe such that each row contains a single chunk with a unique identifier is the most performant for storage and retrieval. This structure aligns well with how data is indexed and queried in vector search applications, making it easier to retrieve specific chunks efficiently.
* Option C: Creating a unique identifier for each document only does not address the need to access individual chunks efficiently, which is critical in a Vector Search application.
* Option D: Storing each chunk as an independent JSON file creates unnecessary overhead and complexity in managing and querying large volumes of files.
OptionBis the most efficient and practical approach, allowing for streamlined indexing and retrieval processes in a Delta table environment, fitting the requirements of a Vector Search index.

NEW QUESTION # 53
After changing the response generating LLM in a RAG pipeline from GPT-4 to a model with a shorter context length that the company self-hosts, the Generative AI Engineer is getting the following error:

What TWO solutions should the Generative AI Engineer implement without changing the response generating model? (Choose two.)

A. Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database
B. Use a smaller embedding model to generate
C. Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents
D. Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi
E. Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model

Answer: A,C

Explanation:
* Problem Context: After switching to a model with a shorter context length, the error message indicating that the prompt token count has exceeded the limit suggests that the input to the model is too large.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Use a smaller embedding model to generate- This wouldn't necessarily address the issue of prompt size exceeding the model's token limit.
* Option B: Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model- This option affects the output length, not the size of the input being too large.
* Option C: Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents- This would help reduce the size of each document chunk fed into the model, ensuring that the input remains within the model's context length limitations.
* Option D: Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database- By retrieving fewer records, the total input size to the model can be managed more effectively, keeping it within the allowable token limits.
* Option E: Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi- Retraining the model is contrary to the stipulation not to change the response generating model.
OptionsCandDare the most effective solutions to manage the model's shorter context length without changing the model itself, by adjusting the input size both in terms of individual document size and total documents retrieved.

NEW QUESTION # 54
A Generative Al Engineer is tasked with developing an application that is based on an open source large language model (LLM). They need a foundation LLM with a large context window.
Which model fits this need?

A. DBRX
B. DistilBERT
C. Llama2-70B
D. MPT-30B

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs an open-source LLM with a large context window to develop an application.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: DistilBERT: While an efficient and smaller version of BERT, DistilBERT does not provide a particularly large context window.
* Option B: MPT-30B: This model, while large, is not specified as being particularly notable for its context window capabilities.
* Option C: Llama2-70B: Known for its large model size and extensive capabilities, including a large context window. It is also available as an open-source model, making it ideal for applications requiring extensive contextual understanding.
* Option D: DBRX: This is not a recognized standard model in the context of large language models with extensive context windows.
Thus,Option C(Llama2-70B) is the best fit as it meets the criteria of having a large context window and being available for open-source use, suitable for developing robust language understanding applications.

NEW QUESTION # 55
A Generative Al Engineer is tasked with improving the RAG quality by addressing its inflammatory outputs.
Which action would be most effective in mitigating the problem of offensive text outputs?

A. Increase the frequency of upstream data updates
B. Restrict access to the data sources to a limited number of users
C. Inform the user of the expected RAG behavior
D. Curate upstream data properly that includes manual review before it is fed into the RAG system

Answer: D

Explanation:
Addressing offensive or inflammatory outputs in a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system is critical for improving user experience and ensuring ethical AI deployment. Here's whyDis the most effective approach:
* Manual data curation: The root cause of offensive outputs often comes from the underlying data used to train the model or populate the retrieval system. By manually curating the upstream data and conducting thorough reviews before the data is fed into the RAG system, the engineer can filter out harmful, offensive, or inappropriate content.
* Improving data quality: Curating data ensures the system retrieves and generates responses from a high-quality, well-vetted dataset. This directly impacts the relevance and appropriateness of the outputs from the RAG system, preventing inflammatory content from being included in responses.
* Effectiveness: This strategy directly tackles the problem at its source (the data) rather than just mitigating the consequences (such as informing users or restricting access). It ensures that the system consistently provides non-offensive, relevant information.
Other options, such as increasing the frequency of data updates or informing users about behavior expectations, may not directly mitigate the generation of inflammatory outputs.

NEW QUESTION # 56
......

If you search for exam materials for your coming exam, you will find that there are so many websites to choose from. And our website is the most reliable one. You can just compare the quality and precision of the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions with ours. Then you will find that our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials are the best among all the study sources available to you. And we have become a famous brand in this career. You won't regret for your choice.

Pdf Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Version: https://www.passcollection.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate_real-exams.html